|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
HAGA Opposes House Bill 78 A bill introduced in the Georgia General Assembly on January 24, 2005 would make it illegal for any person to import, sell, transport, carry, own, keep, or otherwise possess any live pit bull dog in Georgia. A "pit bull" would be defined as "any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel Club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds." If the bill is passed and enacted into law, Georgia residents who own a pit bull as of July 1, 2005 would be forced to sterilize the animal and either keep it fully confined so as to have no contact whatsoever with the public, or have the animal leashed and muzzled and accompanied by an adult if it is taken out in public.
The Humane Association of Georgia adamantly opposes breed-specific legislation such as House Bill 78.
Why is HB 78 a Bad Idea? While breed is one factor which may contribute to a dog's temperament, it alone cannot be used to predict whether a dog may pose a danger to his or her community. A September 2000 study published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (VetMed Today: Special Report) illustrates this point. The report detailed dog-bite-related fatalities in the U.S. from 1979 through 1998, and revealed that, over that 19-year period, at least 25 different breeds or crossbreeds of dogs had been involved in fatally wounding a human being. The breeds cited ranged from the often-maligned pit bulls and rottweilers to the legendary "forever loyal" breed of St. Bernards. The main conclusion of the study was that breed-specific legislation doesn't work for several reasons, including the fact that the inherent problem in trying to determine and prove a dog's breed makes actual enforcement of breed-specific legislation almost impossible. Although breed-specific
legislation has been tried in a few states and municipalities throughout
the country, communities that have banned specific breeds have
discovered that it has not been the easy answer they thought it would
be. In some areas, media hype has actually increased the demand for dogs
whose breeds are in danger of being banned. Animal control agencies,
even those that are well-funded and well-equipped, have found the such
laws to be an enforcement nightmare. What is the Status of HB 78? House Bill 78
is currently assigned to the House Non-Civil Judicial Committee.
Public hearings on the issue were held on 2-17-05. Check our
Action Alerts page for the most
up-to-date information on HB 78. I Want to Join HAGA in Opposing HB 78! What Can I Do? 1. Become educated about HB 78 and the issues surrounding breed-specific legislation.
2. Contact state senators and representatives from your own district, as well as members of the House Non-Civil Judiciary Committee, and oppose passage of House Bill 78.
"Blame the Deed, Not the Breed!"
|
|
||
|
|
||||||